Pages Navigation Menu

Sarah Starrenburg

Bested by the Poms (via breadandjustice)

Posted on Dec 24, 2010 in Politics | 0 comments

Great article on breadandjustice, follow the link to read the whole article there…

It seems we are being bested by the Poms. The brouhaha that erupted in Australia when the Rudd-Gillard government proposed filtering out the worst of the worst 'refused content' classification from internet feeds was stunning in its ferocity. Wild claims were thrown around of the devastating effect on internet speeds, and the democratically elected Australian government was compared to communist China. Apparently, filtering child pornography was … Read More

via breadandjustice

Read More

Reasons for optimism

Posted on Dec 14, 2010 in Politics, Society | 0 comments

Fascinating 5 minute video from the BBC on the increasing health and wealth of the global population over the last 200 years!

We are painfully aware of all that is still so very wrong and unjust in the world, but it is good to also appreciate that clearly, much progress has been made, particularly in regard to international life expectancies. So worth a watch!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkSRLYSojo]

Read More

And in other news…

Posted on Dec 13, 2010 in Politics | 0 comments

Last week, the US State Department issued a press release that they will be hosting the 2011 World Press Freedom Day.

The press release contained the following statement:

The theme for next year’s commemoration will be 21st Century Media: New Frontiers, New Barriers. The United States places technology and innovation at the forefront of its diplomatic and development efforts. New media has empowered citizens around the world to report on their circumstances, express opinions on world events, and exchange information in environments sometimes hostile to such exercises of individuals’ right to freedom of expression. At the same time, we are concerned about the determination of some governments to censor and silence individuals, and to restrict the free flow of information. We mark events such as World Press Freedom Day in the context of our enduring commitment to support and expand press freedom and the free flow of information in this digital age.

 

:)

Read More

Wikileaks – my take, in short.

Posted on Dec 10, 2010 in Politics | 0 comments

It’s interesting that the word treason is being thrown around a lot, despite the fact that Assange is not an American citizen and therefore cannot commit treason against the USA.

I think that more people throughout history have suffered and even died as a result of oppressive governments than as a result of terrorists. So the extent to which we are willing to go to guard against these risks must be balanced in light of this.

I think that no-one can seriously think the sexual assault charges are really and purely about sexual assault charges, and that should tell you something about the real danger now that this information has been released. It’s not from terrorist attack. It’s from politicians wanting to skirt around the law and infringe on the very freedoms they are supposedly enraged at being endangered.

Whether or not this latest round of documents were released in wisdom or foolishness, make no mistake – if a law had clearly been broken by doing so, you can be very sure it would have been clearly identified by now.

Read More

Julian Assange and Deka-Mega-Murderers

Posted on Dec 8, 2010 in Politics | 2 comments

They call them Deka-Mega-Murderers

In the last 40 years, tens of thousands of people have been killed by terrorists.[1]

In the same period, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed by their own governments.

Extend the window to include the glut of totalitarian regimes of the mid-twentieth century, and the figures balloon out to hundreds of millions.

Democide has taken more lives than war, and many times more than terrorism.

Let’s just sit with that reality for a minute.

And now let’s look at Julian Assange.

A Townsville Boy

Julian Paul Assange was born on the 3rd of July, 1971, in Townsville. For five years of his childhood he was in hiding from his father with his mother and brother.

As a teenager, he formed a hacking group with the self-imposed rules:

  • Don’t damage computer systems you break into (including crashing them)
  • Don’t change the information in the systems
  • Share information

After he was tracked down and prosecuted, the judge said, “there is just no evidence that there was anything other than sort of intelligent inquisitiveness and the pleasure of being able to – what’s the expression – surf through these various computers.” 20 year old Julian pleaded guilty and was fined $2100.

Soon after, prompted by his parent’s custody battle during his childhood, and his own with a girlfriend over their son, he formed ‘Parent Inquiry into Child Protection’, an central database for otherwise inaccessible legal records related to child custody issues in Australia.

Going Open Source

In 1993, Assange was involved in starting one of the first internet service providers in Australia. Over the next four years, he worked as a programmer, developed free software, wrote ‘Strobe’, the first free and open source port scanner, and invented an encryption software package for linux intended to be used as a tool for human rights workers who needed to protect sensitive data in the field.

Wikileaks

Wikileaks (which cannot currently be reached at it’s original site of wikileaks.org, but is being mirrored at around 50 other internet sites to keep from being completely blocked by governments – including the Australian government) describes it’s system of information verification and publication as follows:

“WikiLeaks has combined high-end security technologies with journalism and ethical principles. Like other media outlets conducting investigative journalism, we accept (but do not solicit) anonymous sources of information. Unlike other outlets, we provide a high security anonymous drop box fortified by cutting-edge cryptographic information technologies. This provides maximum protection to our sources. We are fearless in our efforts to get the unvarnished truth out to the public. When information comes in, our journalists analyse the material, verify it and write a news piece about it describing its significance to society. We then publish both the news story and the original material in order to enable readers to analyse the story in the context of the original source material themselves.

We assess all news stories and test their veracity. We send a submitted document through a very detailed examination a procedure. Is it real? What elements prove it is real? Who would have the motive to fake such a document and why? We use traditional investigative journalism techniques as well as more modern rtechnology-based methods. Typically we will do a forensic analysis of the document, determine the cost of forgery, means, motive, opportunity, the claims of the apparent authoring organisation, and answer a set of other detailed questions about the document. We may also seek external verification of the document For example, for our release of the Collateral Murder video, we sent a team of journalists to Iraq to interview the victims and observers of the helicopter attack. The team obtained copies of hospital records, death certificates, eye witness statements and other corroborating evidence supporting the truth of the story. Our verification process does not mean we will never make a mistake, but so far our method has meant that WikiLeaks has correctly identified the veracity of every document it has published.

Publishing the original source material behind each of our stories is the way in which we show the public that our story is authentic. Readers don’t have to take our word for it; they can see for themselves. In this way, we also support the work of other journalism organisations, for they can view and use the original documents freely as well. Other journalists may well see an angle or detail in the document that we were not aware of in the first instance. By making the documents freely available, we hope to expand analysis and comment by all the media. Most of all, we want readers know the truth so they can make up their own minds.”[2]

Providing primary sources – my high school modern history teacher would be very happy.

And what good has all this done?

Applauded then Arrested

Wikileaks, had, up until very recently (or perhaps even more so very recently, depending on who you are), been establishing a very respectable and ethical reputation. In 2008 it won the Economist magazine New Media Award. In 2009 Wikileaks and Assange won the Amnesty International’s UK Media Award for the 2008 publication of ‘Kenya: The Cry of Blood – Extra Judicial Killings and Disappearances’ about police killings in Kenya. In May this year, the New York Daily News listed Wikileaks first in a ranking of ‘websites that could totally change the news’.

Does this sound like a man and an organization out to just cause trouble and embaress people?

Or does this sounds like a man who has been on a lifelong quest to seek out the truth and use it to the aid of those with less power?

Now, I’m not saying it’s okay to flout privacy laws. But if that’s the issue, then charge him for breaking privacy laws, in so far as he has. Of course, it’s not entirely clear that is, in fact, what he’s done.

In reality, he’s done what journalists do every day all over the world to the best of their ability. They report on what they’re able to find out from the information given to them by sources. Assange just happened to find a really valuable source. The source is the one who seems to have broken the law. And you know what? The source is in jail for that crime.

Assange just seems to be a really well-connected journalist. An Australian journalist who did what all the journalist heroes in American movies do – publish the truth no matter what.

I’m not a foreign policy expert – I don’t know if what Assange did with some of those documents was wise, or just kind’ve dumb.

But you know what?

We don’t arrest people for dumb.

We don’t allow extradition of our citizens for dumb.

And no one can seriously think that the sex charges are really about sex charges, whether or not they have any basis whatsoever in reality.

The real threat isn’t what the terrorists will do now that this information is out. The real threat is what the politicians will do.


[1] Think tanks that track terror fatalities such as the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, a Centre of Excellence of the US Department of Homeland Security, and the Global Terrorism Database, an open-source database including information on terrorist events around the world.

Read More